Featuring Pamela Geller, Nonie Darwish, Simon Deng and Robert Spencer
More yelling from the Left fascists, but a few worthwhile moments.
via: Jihadwatch.com
Q and A at Islamic Apartheid Conference at Temple University, April 23 (via Jihadwatch.com)4/26/2012 Featuring Pamela Geller, Nonie Darwish, Simon Deng and Robert Spencer More yelling from the Left fascists, but a few worthwhile moments. via: Jihadwatch.com
0 Comments
In WND this morning I explain how I wrote my new book, Did Muhammad Exist?, out of respect for Muslims: My new book, “Did Muhammad Exist? An Inquiry Into Islam’s Obscure Origins,” is out this week, and it has already aroused anger among Muslims: A Muslim writer named Hussein Rashid, who is an instructor at the Center for Spiritual Inquiry at Park Avenue Christian Church, fulminated in Religion Dispatches that my book on Muhammad will win praise only from the “Islamophobia industry” – as if the book itself were a manifestation of hatred and bigotry. I’m reminded of the words of the Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh as the Islamic jihadist Mohammed Bouyeri began sawing his head off in retaliation for his film “Submission” about the plight of Muslim women: “Can’t we talk about this?” No, we can’t. In America, speaking unpopular truths about Islam won’t get you murdered, but it will get you consigned to the outer darkness, where hatemongers and bigots weep and gnash their teeth. Many people wouldn’t dare write (or read) a book entitled “Did Muhammad Exist?” for fear of getting Muslims angry and getting called names.
I, on the other hand, am determined to respect Muslims and treat them as adults. In fact, that’s why I wrote “Did Muhammad Exist?” – for I believe that even in the politically correct United States of 2012, we should be able to discuss in an adult manner the historical evidence for and against the existence of Muhammad. The Scriptures and religious figures of Judaism and Christianity have been subjected to searching historical scrutiny since the 18th century. No one riots, no one threatens, no one gets killed as a result of these investigations – no one rails against the “Judeophobia industry” or “Christianophobia industry.” To be sure, some historical critics have been motivated by an animus toward the religion they’re studying, but no one in the West is interfering with their right to undertake such study. Only around Islam does the scholarly community walk on eggshells. It’s time to stop. Not only should the quest for the historical Muhammad be carried on in our nation’s universities, but we should dare to treat Muslims as adults in other ways as well. Instead of politically correct obfuscation about the political and supremacist aspects of Islam, there should be a vigorous public debate about the ways in which Islamic law, Shariah, is incompatible with pluralistic democracy, and the ways in which Islam is incompatible with Western ideas of human rights. Moreover, as adults we ought not to have to make patronizing references to the “Noble People of Afghanistan,” as Gen. John Allen did in his embarrassingly obsequious apology to the Afghans for the inadvertent burning of Qurans on a NATO base. As adults we ought not to have to pretend that the “Arab Spring” is a glorious flowering of freedom when in fact it is a series of pro-Shariah Islamic-supremacist takeovers.... There is more. The United Nations is holding its' "Conference on Sustainable Development" in Rio de Janero, Brazil, over three separate sessions in June, to which organizers, led by UN Conference Secretary-General of Rio+20, Sha Zukang[who 'really doesn't like Americans'], expect 193 attendees from governments, the private sector, NGOs and other stakeholders, according to the Sarah de Sainte Croix March 20, 2012 article in The Rio Times.
The stated themes of this colossal conference, which is structured around a 204-page report titled, "Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy, A United Nations System-Wide Perspective," are “the green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication,” ... [by and through] ... "the institutional framework for sustainable development,” according to George Russell's excellent and quoted-filled FOXNews article today. More specifically, the debates will cover a ... 'breathtaking array of carbon taxes, transfers of trillions of dollars from wealthy countries to poor ones, and new spending programs to guarantee that populations around the world are protected--from the effects of the very programs the world organization wants to implement. According to Russell, the Obama Administration officials have supported this "agenda," which is designed to 'make dramatic and enormously expensive changes in the way that the world does nearly everything—or, as one of the documents puts it, "a fundamental shift in the way we think and act." According to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, proposals on how the “challenges can and must be addressed,” include: --'More than $2.1 trillion a year in wealth transfers from rich countries to poorer ones, in the name of fostering “green infrastructure ... climate adaptation ... other green economy” measures.' --'New carbon taxes for industrialized countries [amounting to] about $250 billion a year, or 0.6 percent of [US] GDP by 2020. Other environmental taxes are mentioned, but not specified.' --'Further unspecified price hikes ... derived from agriculture, fisheries, forestry, or other kinds of land and water use [industries], all of which would be radically reorganized--[to] “contribute to a more level playing field between established, 'brown' technologies and newer, greener ones."' -- 'Major global social spending programs, including a "social protection floor" and "social safety nets" for the world's most vulnerable social groups for reasons of “equity.”' --'Even more social benefits for those displaced by [this] green economy revolution—such as those put out of work in undesirable fossil fuel industries. The benefits, called “investments,” would include “access to nutritious food, health services, education, training and retraining, and unemployment benefits."' --'A guarantee that if those sweeping benefits weren’t enough, more would be granted ... “Any adverse effects of changes in prices of goods and services, vital to the welfare of vulnerable groups, must be compensated for and new livelihood opportunities provided."' “Transforming the global economy will require action locally (e.g., through land use planning), at the national level (e.g., through energy-use regulations) and at the international level (e.g., through technology diffusion),” the document says. It involves “profound changes in economic systems, in resource efficiency, in the composition of global demand, in production and consumption patterns and a major transformation in public policy-making.” It will also require “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries.” This 'UN guidebook for global social engineering,' was prepared by the Geneva-based United Nations Environmental Management Group (UNEMG), a consortium of 36 U.N. agencies, development banks and environmental bureaucracies--all of which rely on the contributions, from tax collecting nations for their very existence--not a single entity engaged in the production of goods or services, producing a profit and owning singular wealth. This UN doctrine seems to directly channel Marx and Engel's scribe of 1848, "The Communist Manifesto," wherein its' organizational and operational structure appears to largely be a paraphrasical equivalent to the 10 short-term demands Marx prescribed in section II., "Proletarians and Communists." However, instead of the UN overthrowing the capitalist system, it simply wants to tie it to a leash and be subject to the UN ... [a] 'dictatorship of theproletariat,' to redistribute wealth around the world to "magically elevate the poverty class to the middle class. The United States, arguably the most fertile and favorable ground for such a massive experiment, has already spent $15 [T]rillion in taxpayer treasure over the past 47 years attempting to circumvent market forces and eliminate poverty--with no affect. Additionally, study after study has revealed the UN to have grown into an impossibly dysfunctional gargantuan, having negligent management skills, metrics and accountability, and a source of financially wasteful pandering--second only to the U.S. General Services Administration. Actually, as this directly smacks of the long-discussed "UN Agenda 21," America must treat this audacity of the United Nations as a wake up call, and say "[last] check please"--then hit the UN exit doors without delay. If you like what you have read, please use the free "Subscribe" button to the right of Mr. Klein's photo in the upper left corner of the page--so that you don't miss a signal article. "Stay informed to stay ahead!" via Examiner: http://www.examiner.com/article/un-to-debut-plan-for-world-socialism-at-rio-20-conference-time-for-us-to-exit John McCain's 2008 campaign staff allegedly had evidence that Democrats stuffed ballot boxes in Pennsylvania and Ohio on election night, but McCain chose not to pursue voter fraud, according to internal Stratfor emails published by WikiLeaks.
In an email sent on November 7, 2008, and titled " Insight - The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only - Pls Do Not Forward **," Stratfor vice president of intelligence Fred Burton wrote: 1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to "out". In an email sent two days earlier and titled "Insight - McCain #5 ** internal use only - Pls do not forward **," Burton wrote: After discussions with his inner circle, which explains the delay in his speech, McCain decided not to pursue the voter fraud in PA and Ohio, despite his staff's desire to make it an issue. He said no. Staff felt they could get a federal injunction to stop the process. McCain felt the crowds assembled in support of Obama and such would be detrimental to our country and it would do our nation no good for this to drag out like last go around, coupled with the possibility of domestic violence. The Nov. 7 email also contains allegations that Democrats made a "six-figure donation" to Rev. Jesse Jackson to silence him on the topic of Israel after an October 2008 interview in which he said Obama’s presidency would remove the clout of “Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades.” Burton, who appears to be friendly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wrote: 2) It appears the Dems "made a donation" to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a "nice six-figure donation". This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. The email also refers to an accusation that Obama's campaign took money from Russia, recalling memories of Bill Clinton's 1996 presidential campaign when the Justice Department uncovered evidence that China sought to make direct contributions to the Democratic National Committee. Burton wrote: 3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out. If true the allegations prompt questions of how the fallout has affected the politics of Obama's current administration and how it will effect this year's presidential election. Interestingly, Mitt Romney is also facing allegations of voter fraud in Massachusetts as he cast a ballot for Republican Scott Brown in January 2010 in the special election to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy but didn’t own property in the state at the time. Romney registered to vote listing his son’s unfinished basement as his residence, but the Romneys' former realtor told GOP consultant Fred Karger that they moved to California. Anyone found guilty of committing voter fraud faces up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Burton is a former Deputy Chief of the Department of State's counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS). The DSS assists the Department of Defense in following leads and doing forensic analysis of hard drives seized by the U.S. government in ongoing criminal investigations. Stratfor provides confidential intelligence services to large corporationsand government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Marines and the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency. WikiLeaks has published 973 out of what it says is a cache of 5 million internal Stratfor emails (dated between July 2004 and December 2011) obtained by the hacker collective Anonymous around Christmas. via Business Insider; Military and Defense: http://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-stratfor-emails-democrats-tampered-with-2008-election-2012-4 via Judicial Watch
In this new era of political correctness, the U.S. Army has published a special handbook for soldiers that appears to justify Islamic jihad by describing it as the “communal military defense of Islam and Muslims when they are threatened or under attack.” Because radical Muslim groups consider Islam to be perpetually under moral, spiritual, economic, political and military attack by the “secular west” they consider military jihad a “constant necessity” and use it as a “rallying cry to resist and attack all this is un-Islamic,” according to the new Army manual. The handbook was created to help soldiers become “culturally literate” ambassadors with sensitivity and understanding of Islamic civilization. The goal is to help them understand how vital culture is in accomplishing military missions. Military personnel who have a distorted picture of a host culture make enemies for the United States. At least that’s what the publication (“Culture Cards: Afghanistan & Islamic Culture”) says. An organization of scientists dedicated to national and international security issues discovered the new Army tool and published it on its website a few days ago. The manual has nearly three dozen informative chapters dedicated to subjects such as Muslim taboos, the five pillars if Islam, Jihad, the Quran and Muslim festivals. There are also sections on ethnocentrism, cultural relativism and social norms and mores. The lengthy introduction defines cultural competency—awareness and sensitivity of another group—and social norms and mores in Arab countries. The portion on jihad is especially interesting because it’s described as a wide-ranging term that includes the everyday spiritual and moral struggle to live a life submitted to God, the attempt to spread Islam by education and example, and the communal military defense of Islam and Muslims when they are threatened or under attack. Today radical Muslim groups consider Islam to be perpetually under attack by the “secular West” – morally, spiritually, economically, politically and militarily, the Army handbook says. They thus consider military jihad as a constant necessity, and use jihad as a rallying cry to resist and attack all that is un-Islamic. At the end of each section there is a question that’s supposed to stimulate “critical thinking.” At the end of the jihad section the question is: “How can the concept of jihad add legitimacy to the claims and aims of Al Qaeda and others? It would certainly be interesting to see how most enlisted men and women, or American civilians for that matter, would answer that particular question. The new Army manual concludes by revealing all the things that make soldiers “culturally literate.” Among them are appreciating and accepting diverse beliefs, appearances and lifestyles, understanding the dangers of stereotyping and ethnocentrism and understanding Islamic and jihadist cultures. Read Article Here: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/11/u-s-army-makes-soldiers-culturally-literate-about-islam/ YOUR THOUGHTS??: Jay Walker and I are headed to a "First Coast Tea Party" Rally down at "The Landing" in downtown Jacksonville today,... as Jay put it so well,......."I'm fighting this battle on mutiple fronts!"... and I would have to concur with that statement. lol Hope all goes well, and We find some more Inspiration in all this because I've got to say,.. I'm worried! With Our Votes being counted in SPAIN!!,.. And by a company who is a donor to the "Usurper In Chief" REALLY!! takes My thoughts of having this all resolved in a Peaceful way.. and through Rule of Law and Our Votes,.. to a more uneasy place. I'm thinking more and more,.. that if We even make it to Elections w/o Martial Law being fully implimented,.. they WILL~!! Be Subverted by the Left and ultimately Stolen. Which brings Me to the only inevitable outcome of such things,.. pushing Us twords the very thing We as a Nation don't want,.. but will so desperately need by that point if We are to continue as a Constitutional Republic.
Because We simply cannot continue as a Free Nation if We don't rid Our Nation of these Leftist Subversives. I'm not advocating the abolishment of the Democratic Party by any means,.. We were founded as a Nation which was established to have very important Checks and Balances,.. to assure the Constitutional Republic survives. Besides,.. The Democratic Party of old was Hijacked nearly 100 years ago by so called "Liberal Progressives". So What I'm getting at,.. is the Democratic Party needs to TAKE A STAND!! If there are even any True Patriots left among them who can still look themselves in the mirror, and still believe in Costitutional Rule of Law, And American Exceptionalism,.. to RID THEIR PARTY OF THESE LEFTIST-MARXIST-PROGRESSIVES!! who are trying to Subvert Our Rule of Law, and destroy Us from within. As I for One!!,.. with all My Belief's and Great Pride in This Nation and It's Constitution,.. would JOIN THEM IN THIS FIGHT!! To Rid Our Lands of these Transgressors!! May We Ultimately STAND UNITED! for the good of the Republic,.. For the good of Our Children,.. AND!,.. Our American Legacy! "May GOD SAVE THE REPUBLIC!" With ever increasing threats to Our Liberty through EO after EO,.. Usurpation and Subversion of the Rule of Law,.... ..... a question come's to mind of Many Americans. What are the People who have swarn an Oath to protect the Constitution and the People of the United Sates of America,.. from ALL! Enemies,.. both Foreign AND! Domestic,.. going to do about it? Will they step up to the plate? Because God help Us ALL!,... if they don't And here We go again!,..
It never ceases to amaze Me how the Democrats will give a pass to those not even a Citizen of this Country, to be here unlawfully. And strangely enough,.. Just before what will probibly be the most impotant Election in American History! Knowing their propensity to call themselves "Champions of Minorities" it makes perfect sense to Me why this is being done. My main concern is that many still don't see what's going on here,.. Our Electioral System is being SUBVERTED!! So now We have what's called an “Unlawful Presence Waiver” being given to ILLEGALS! DHS To Grant Illegal Aliens “Unlawful Presence Waivers” In its quest to implement stealth amnesty, the Obama Administration is working behind the scenes to halt the deportation of certain illegal immigrants by granting them “unlawful presence waivers.” The new measure would apply to illegal aliens who are relatives of American citizens. Here is how it would work, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcement posted in today’s Federal Register, the daily journal of the U.S. government; the agency will grant “unlawful presence waivers” to illegal aliens who can prove they have a relative that’s a U.S. citizen. Currently such aliens must return to their native country and request a waiver of inadmissibility in an existing overseas immigrant visa process. In other words, they must enter the U.S. legally as thousands of foreigners do on a yearly basis. Besides the obvious security issues, changing this would be like rewarding bad behavior in a child. It doesn’t make sense. But the system often causes U.S. citizens to be separated for extended periods from their immediate relatives,” according to the DHS. The proposed changes, first announced in January, will significantly reduce the length of time U.S. citizens are separated from their loved ones while required to remain outside the United States during the current visa processing system. The administration also claims that relaxing the rule will also “create efficiencies for both the U.S. government and most applicants.” How exactly is not listed in the Federal Register announcement, which gives the public 60 days to comment. That’s only a formality since the DHS has indicated that the change is pretty much a done deal. This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty. The plan has been in the works for years and in 2010 Texas’s largest newspaper published an exposé about a then-secret DHS initiative that systematically cancelled pending deportations. The remarkable program stunned the legal profession and baffled immigration attorneys who said the government bounced their clients’ deportation even when expulsion was virtually guaranteed. In late 2011 a mainstream newspaper obtained internal Homeland Security documents outlining “sweeping changes” in immigration enforcement that halt the deportation of illegal aliens with no criminal records. This also includes a nationwide “training program” to assure that enforcement agents and prosecuting attorneys don’t remove illegal immigrants who haven’t been convicted of crimes. Judicial Watch has been a front runner in investigating the Obama Administration’s stealth amnesty program by pursuing DHS records concerning “deferred action” or “parole” to suspend removal proceedings against a particular group of individuals. Last spring JW sued DHS to obtain information because the agency ignored a federal public records request that dates back to July 2010. via Judicial Watch http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/04/dhs-to-grant-illegal-aliens-unlawful-presence-waivers/ Read the full announcement on the "Federal Register" via Times24/7.com
Read more: http://times247.com/articles/week-exposed-obama-s-weakness#ixzz1rvyCtwpB A newly-released FOX News poll, complemented with the latest Gallup weekly tracking numbers, suggest ... that Obama's approval ratings with white voters have dropped so badly that even a surge in minority turnout and enthusiasm towards Obama wouldn't be enough to win him a second term. The poll, released Thursday, shows Obama with a brutal 34 percent job approval rating with white voters. That's not necessarily an outlier: Gallup's latest weekly track found his job approval rating at 36 percent with white voters. (For context, Democrats still managed to win 37 percent of the white vote in the 2010 midterms, even as they lost a historic 63 House seats that year.) And his approval with nonwhites — at 71 percent in Gallup, 65 percent in the Fox survey — is far from the 80 percent he tallied in the 2008 general election. Polling data are only a snapshot in time, and there have been other surveys (like the ABC/Washington Post poll, released earlier this week) showing better outcomes for Obama. But what all these numbers suggest is that things have the potential to get worse for the president. And needless to say, with the Rosen flap and weaker-than-expected jobs data, this hasn't been a good week for the president. Read the original article at National Journal Read more: http://times247.com/articles/week-exposed-obama-s-weakness#ixzz1rvwR68Nc via "Jihad Watch"
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/04/virginia-muslim-to-be-sentenced-today-for-misunderstanding-islam-making-video-supporting-jihad-terro.html An update on this story. "Woodbridge man to be sentenced for supporting Pakistani terrorist group," by Naomi Jagoda in the Washington Examiner, April 13: A Woodbridge man is scheduled to be sentenced Friday in federal court in Alexandria for aiding a Pakistani terrorist group by making a video that was intended to support its jihad, court records show. Pakistani native Jubair Ahmad, 24, pleaded guilty in December to providing matetrial [sic] support or resources to terrorists. Ahmad admitted to posting a video that would be used by Lashkar-e-Tayyiba. The organization focuses on attacks on India, especially the disputed region of Kashmir between India and Pakistan. Ahmad had communicated with Talha Saeed, the son of LeT leader Hafiz Muhammad Saeed. In September 2010, Ahmad prepared a video at the request of Talha Saeed and uploaded it to a YouTube account. Ahmad had reason to believe LeT would use it to promote jihad, according to a court document.... |